For years
pipelines have been constructed by manual welders using conventional arc
welding processes and consumables. This approach is still used to construct
small-diameter, low-pressure pipelines as well as tie-ins and repairs on larger
diameter, high-pressure pipelines.
However,
for larger diameter pipeline projects, there has been a shift away from manual
arc welding to more automated arc welding systems, with multiple welding arcs.
The automation aspect of these systems allows for better control of the welding
parameters and a reduction in the total volume of weld metal required by moving
away from conventional V-groove designs to narrower groove designs. Multiple
welding arcs allow for the deposition of more than one pass per trip around the
pipe, dramatically reducing the time required to complete the weld.
Recent research has been focused on alternatives to arc welding
while still maintaining, at a minimum, the same level of productivity. Two
welding processes have shown promise as alternatives to arc welding while being
able to increase productivity. The two welding processes are Hybrid Laser Arc
Welding (HLAW) and Friction Stir Welding (FSW). Historically these welding
processes had limited portability so they had been restricted to the
laboratory. However, recent advancements have allowed these processes to move
out of the laboratory and into the field.
The HLAW process is a combination of laser beam welding and arc
welding in the same weld pool. HLAW has been used with a variety of lasers
(e.g. CO2, Nd:YAG, fiber, and disk) and arc welding processes (e.g., gas
tungsten arc welding and gas metal arc welding), with the most common arc
welding process being pulsed gas metal arc welding.
The HLAW process takes advantage of the high energy density of
the laser beam while benefiting from the alloying and fit-up tolerances of the
arc welding process. One application for HLAW is deep penetration, single-pass
welds in thick material which increases productivity by reducing the total
number of weld passes needed to fill a joint. It also significantly reduces the
heat-input as compared to conventional arc welding processes.
Another application for HLAW is high-speed welding using the
laser beam to stabilize the weld pool. The weld pool stabilization prevents
weld humping at high speeds and improves side-wall fusion in groove welds. This
application of HLAW boosts productivity by increasing the maximum travel speed
that can be achieved by arc welding alone.
HLAW has been used on a wide variety of materials and
thicknesses. For butt joints, the amount of laser power dictates the depth of
penetration that can be obtained in a single pass. Generally speaking, 0.040
inch (1 mm) of penetration is obtained per kilowatt of laser power at typical
HLAW travel speeds. For example a 1.1-inch (28-mm) full-penetration weld has
been deposited using 30 kW of laser power. This picture shows a
full-penetration, single-pass HLAW weld using 10 kW of laser power.
HLAW has been considered a laboratory or factory-welding process
due to laser equipment limitations (i.e., size and cooling requirements). With
the recent advancements of high-power, solid-state lasers (e.g. disk and fiber)
this perception has begun to erode. Disk and fiber lasers can provide more than
20 kW of laser power at a significantly higher electrical efficiency than their
predecessors (approximately 25% wall-plug efficiency vs. approximately 5% for
CO2 and Nd:YAG lasers). This improved electrical efficiency has dramatically
decreased the equipment size, making HLAW a more realistic alternative to arc
welding of pipelines. A portable HLAW system has been developed and
successfully demonstrated in a simulated field environment.
Friction Stir Welding is a solid-state process which relies on
frictional heating and localized forging to join two pieces of material. The
FSW weld is made by plunging a non-consumable, rotating tool into the base
material which subsequently traverses a joint seam. The shoulder constrains the
plasticized material while the pin stirs the interface to produce a fully
consolidated weld. Advantages of this process include low distortion, no
hazardous fumes, and welds with matching base material mechanical properties.
From the beginning, FSW targeted the joining of soft metals such
as aluminum alloys where it has enjoyed considerable success in the automotive,
aerospace and shipping industries, among others. The FSW process has been used
to make welds in aluminum up to 3-inch (76.2-mm) thick in a single pass. In the
past 10 years, FSW has seen considerable growth in the joining of hard metals such
as steel, titanium and nickel alloys. These achievements are due to the
development of new tool materials (e.g. PCBN, tungsten rhenium) and the
advancements in tool design. The FSW process has deposited welds in steel up to
0.75-inch (19.1 mm) thick and in
titanium up to 1-inch (25.4-mm) thick in a single pass.
Most
FSW machines are non-portable fixed installation machines. A few organizations
have been able to produce portable FSW systems for applications which include
pipeline construction. Existing FSW equipment has successfully been
demonstrated on several different diameter pipes in both the 1G and 5G welding
positions. FSW equipment research is looking into developing completely
automated systems aiming for push-button functionality, equipment flexibility
to weld different diameter pipes, and improved machine portability.
When new technology is developed, it takes time to become
accepted by industry. This is especially true for the pipeline industry, which
is heavily regulated by the government. The Code of Federal Regulations Title
49 Part 192 and Part 195 govern the design, construction, operation and
maintenance of gas and liquid pipelines, respectively. Both Parts require that
the welding procedure and welder be qualified to the American Petroleum
Institute (API) Standard 1104, Welding of Pipelines and Related Facilities, or
Section IX of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and
Pressure Vessel Code. Neither API 1104 nor Section IX of ASME has qualification
requirements for HLAW or FSW. ASME has recognized this deficiency and is
developing qualification requirements for both processes.
Since the most common form of HLAW is a combination of GMAW and
Laser Beam Welding (LBW), the proposed HLAW procedure qualification variables,
as defined by ASME, are a combination of the applicable GMAW and laser-welding
variables with a few additional variables specific to HLAW. Some HLAW specific
variables include beam-to-wire spacing tolerances and process-orientation definitions
(i.e. wire leading or laser leading).
FSW is a unique welding process that requires numerous variables
specific to the process. The proposed FSW procedure qualification variables
include those that are shared with other welding processes (joint variables,
base metals variables, etc.) in addition to tool and equipment variables that
are specific to FSW.
HLAW and FSW have been shown to improve productivity compared to
typical arc welding processes. The increased productivity comes from either an
increase in the maximum achievable travel speed or by increasing the
single-pass weld thickness which reduces the total number of passes required to
complete a pipeline girth weld. The HLAW process has been used to deposit an
acceptable single-pass, full-penetration weld in carbon steel up to 3-inch
(76.2-mm) thick and systems have been developed to take HLAW outside the
laboratory on fixed position pipelines. The FSW process has been used to
produce a full thickness, single-pass welds in 0.75-inch (19.1-mm) thick steel
with portable machines being developed for field applications.
Although both welding processes have shown promise for field
pipeline construction, more research and development is required. Prior to
waiting for the industry to ask the questions, ASME is developing qualification
requirements that can be used by the pipeline construction contractors
interested in applying these new welding technologies. Hopefully, with the ASME
guidance in place, the acceptance of either HLAW or FSW as an alternative to
arc welding of large-diameter pipelines will be a smooth transition.
source :
http://pgjonline.com/2011/02/09/advanced-pipeline-welding-technologies-boost-productivity/
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar